Tag Archives: RDT

Ranking the Banjo-Kazooie Worlds

Banjo-Kazooie even today can be argued as the greatest 3D platformer of all time. One major reason is its level quality. While I’m intending to rank these based on what I think is the best, the word best of course is subject to debate. Also, I am only ranking the main levels, so no Spiral Mountain or Quiz show stuff…

9. Clanker’s Cavern

bkclanker

The only world I would say I don’t like here. The swimming is a bit of a pain (although swimming physics are top notch here) and the world primarily revolves around a metal fish. It looks dull. There’s still some good stuff in this though, including my favorite empty honeycomb piece spot, Wonderwing and a cool jumping mini-game in the fish.

8. Rusty Bucket Bay

bkrusty

I appreciate the challenge of Rusty Bucket Bay, but the contaminated water and engine rooms are more pain than pleasure. Navigating the boat itself is fun though. Despite the engine room I appreciate the challenge of getting all 100 notes as well.

7. Bubblegloop Swamp

bkbubble

I think the top 7 levels are significantly better than Rusty Bucket Bay and Clanker’s Cavern. Mr. Vile’s challenge is a lot of fun and being a crocodile is a lot of fun. What holds Bubblegloop Swamp back is that it’s more of a chore to get around with the wading boots…and it’s not like there’s an easy way back to Mumbo’s everytime you want to switch.

6. Mumbo’s Mountain

bkmumbo

One of the best examples of a first level teaching you through the ropes. You learn about Jinjos, Mumbo Transformations, throwing eggs and pretty much everything else you need. It’s a bit too easy for my tastes but still quite good. I think a terminate was an odd choice to introduce the Mumbo transformation though.

5. Gobi’s Valley

bkgobi

We’re already in the “A” tier here, and having five of the nine worlds be at that level is quite an accomplishment. Gobi’s Valley has a lot of fun jiggies and characters (like Gobi!). There’s a lot to do here such as wading through sand, getting access to the running shoes and beating short clocks or flying through small holes with spikes. There’s a magic carpet ride too! I actually dislike Donkey Kong 64’s Aztec level mainly because Gobi’s Valley owns so much.

4. Treasure Trove Cove

bktreasure

There are so many areas to explore in Treasure Trove Cove. Banjo-Kazooie smartly introduces flying here and it makes Treasure Trove Cove that much bigger. Fight an evil shellfish named Nipper, find gold for a pirate, fly up to the lighthouse or put some codes into a magical sandcastle. Just watch out for Snacker…

3. Freezeezy Peak

bkfreeze

This snow/Christmas themed level has a lot going on as well. I find this to be the rich man’s Mario 64 Snowman’s Land. There’s a HUGE Snowman to climb this time around, a Christmas tree full of presents to explore and some polar bears to race. There’s also the legend of the ice key that you may encounter…

2. Mad Monster Mansion

bkmadmonster

We are now in the S tier. Mad Monster Mansion is super fun to explore. It has a clever Mumbo Transformation (Pumpkin!) and several smart jiggies. There’s a church and a haunted house to explore, and probably my favorite “race the clock” jiggy. My personal favorite world for sure.

1. Click Clock Wood

bkclick

A purely genius world. Click Clock Wood is actually four seasons, and each season presents its own challenges. What you do in each season affects the other. Something you do in Spring may effect something that happens in Summer, for example. It also has an amazing theme during the Springtime. A really fun 100 note challenge lies here too.

 

Sports Oddities: Yinka Dare

This series of articles (looking to do it bi-weekly) focuses on a bizzaro or oddball statistical anomaly that played in professional sports. I probably will run out of players to do this with eventually though. This is the 2nd edition of Sports Oddities!

With a mid-1st round pick in the 1994 NBA Draft, the New Jersey Nets selected Nigerian Yinka Dare. By the time he was eligible for the NBA draft he wasn’t an unknown. He averaged a 13-10 for George Washington University and had led them to the Sweet 16 of the NCAA Tournament.

To be blunt, Yinka Dare was objectively terrible in the NBA. Some of that seemed like bad luck as in his first game of his rookie season he tore his ACL in just three minutes of action. The Nets seemingly gave up on him already as they left him exposed in the 1995 expansion draft (Toronto and Vancouver wisely passed). In his first real season he shot 44% and averaged 2.8 PPG and 2.1 RPG in about 10 MPG.

And he didn’t register one assist.

Not one.

He set the NBA Record for most games played in a season without registering an assist (58).

So yes, he was quite the punchline at this point.  It wouldn’t be until his 78th game, a game against the Raptors, until he’d record one. He’d record four total assists in his entire career. The video above was about 10 games before he’d finally record an assist.

Four career assists against 96 career turnovers? In recent times Dare’s name had come up again as Hassan Whiteside started his career with 26 games without an assist. Still nothing like the Dare though.

Sports Oddities: Herb Washington

This series of articles (looking to do it bi-weekly) focuses on a bizzaro or oddball statistical anomaly that played in professional sports. I probably will run out of players to do this with eventually though. Nonetheless the first one involves a personal (yet silly) story.

When I was a kid I had a baseball book that seemed to just be random stories (I really don’t remember except there was a Christy Mathewson and Grover Cleveland Alexander story in there). One story seemed quite odd and interesting. It was about a track runner whom the Oakland A’s signed to just run the bases. He was the team’s “designated runner”. This is about Herb Washington.

Washington had tied track world records and was signed by the As in 1974. Oddly enough, according to Wiki, his contract required he grow facial hair (which he couldn’t quite do). The statistical oddity? Washington never had one at-bat in 105 career games. Never. He was a “pinch runner” (as his baseball card said) and would replace players who got on base. He stole 31 bases in his career. Unfortunately, his big moment was a bad one as he was picked off in the 9th inning of a World Series game.

Washington was released in 1975. He never went up to bat, played the field or anything. He just ran.

My personal story: I was playing the Sports Edition of “Who Wants To Be A Millionaire” with a friend of mine and this story came up as the $250,000 or $500,000 question. You would not believe how excited I got. Probably one of my best gaming moments ever.

Top 100 Basketball Player of All Time – 2016 Edition

We are a week removed from the NBA Finals and its result shook the foundation of my Top 100 (and should have shaken everyone’s Top lists). So let’s look through my Top 100 and see what’s changed.

Dropped out: Mark Price
Unfortunately for Price a new player has joined the Top 100, and that means Price drops out. Perhaps next year I’ll expand to a Top 125.

100. Tom Chambers (-1)
99. Tim Hardaway (-1)
98. Manu Ginobili (-1) – Could be a big playoffs away from going up about 10 spots, but it looks like he’s done and may retire.
97. Alonzo Mourning (-1)
96. Dikembe Mutombo (-1)
95. Yao Ming (-1)
94. Vince Carter (-1) – I feel like I have to re-evaluate Carter in the future. Is he really better than Mutombo, Mourning, Yao?
93. Carmelo Anthony (-1) – Needs something to move up. Not making the playoffs in the East these days is inexcusable if you’re a top player.
92. Kevin Johnson (-1)
91. Shawn Kemp (-1)

Everyone in this group dropped a spot as the new entry is already in the 80s.

90. Robert Horry (-1)
89. Chris Mullin (-1)
88. Bob Dandridge (-1)
87. Paul Westphal (-1)
86. Dan Issel (-1)
85. Artis Gilmore (-1)
84. Russell Westbrook (NEW) – With his first NBA 1st Team selection, as well as being part of a dangerous 1-2 punch with Kevin Durant that almost beat the 73 win Warriors, it was impossible to deny Westbrook a Top 100 spot. I feel like he’s at the level of Tracy McGrady at the moment, but Westbrook is still young and will probably only trend upwards.
83. Tracy McGrady
82. Joe Dumars
81. Sidney Moncrief

Westbrook’s the only new player in the Top 100.
80. Lenny Wilkins
79. Earl Monroe
78. Tony Parker – Looking like he’s close to done as well. Will need a big season or playoffs to really move up at all.
77. Chris Webber
76. David Thompson
75. Jerry Lucas
74. Pete Maravich
73. Dwight Howard (-1) – Drops a spot to Bosh, will explain below.
72. Chris Bosh (+1) – Passes Howard, will explain below.
71. Dennis Rodman

Really liked how Chris Bosh played this year, even though he unfortunately was done after 53 games because of his heart (and his career might be over). While Dwight performed below expectations once again Bosh was the leader of a Heat team that I think could have given Cleveland a run for their money had he been healthy. Combine this with Bosh’s transformation as a top role player/third guy on the Heat title teams and I think his career is slightly more impressive than Howards. Yeah, Dwight had a better peak, but I’ll take Bosh’s overall career this time. Dwight SHOULD be better than what he is though.

70. Adrian Dantley
69. Alex English
68. Bob McAdoo
67. Tom Heihnson
66. Tiny Archibald
65. Pau Gasol – Impressive that Gasol keeps going, but I think I need to see one more good playoff run to consider putting him in the Top 60.
64. Reggie Miller
63. Bill Sharmin
62. Dave Debusschere
61. Robert Parish

No movement here. Only one that can change their legacy is Gasol.
60. Bernard King
59. Elvin Hayes
58. Dolph Schayes
57. Paul Arizin
56. Dominique Wilkins
55. Billy Cunningham (-1)
54. Hal Greer (-1)
53. Nate Thurmond (-1)
52. Wes Unseld (-1)
51. Chris Paul (+4)

CP3 is one of the toughest to rank. His advanced stats are incredible and he’s clearly a positive on his team. How much of it is his fault that he can’t get out of Round 2? Yes, he keeps running into the juggernauts of the West, but he should have at least been able to get by some of them, right? (He had home court vs. the Spurs in 2008 in Game 7 and was up 3-1 on the Rockets in 2015). I think in terms of success CP3 isn’t much different than Dominique. They just can’t get past those juggernauts of their respective conferences. This year injuries cost Paul a chance at a deep playoff run. But he’s running out of time. He’ll probably inch towards the top 40 with these continual great seasons, but unless there’s some playoff success that’s probably as far as he’d go.

50. James Worthy
49. Dennis Johnson
48. Bill Walton (-1)
47. Ray Allen (-1)
46. Chauncey Billups (-1)
45. George Gervin (-1)
44. Sam Jones (-1)
43. Clyde Drexler (-1)
42. George Mikan (-1)
41. Jason Kidd (-1)

We had one player move up…we’ll get there eventually.
40. Paul Pierce (-1)
39. Allen Iverson (-1)
38. Gary Payton (-1)
37. Patrick Ewing (-1)
36. Dave Cowens (-2)
35. Steve Nash (-2)
34. Kevin Durant (+1) – It seems like a minimal move for Durant. On one hand I was super impressed that he got past the Spurs. On the other hand, he needed one more really big performance to get past Golden State and didn’t get it done. His career is impressive no doubt, but I’m going to need more for him to break into the Top 30.
33. Kevin McHale (-1)
32. Walt Frazier (-1)
31. Willis Reed (-1)

All of these drops are because of the player who went up from the 40s. Durant obviously has potential to move up a lot depending on how things go from here.

30. Rick Barry (-1)
29. Bob Cousy (-1)
28. John Stockon (-1)
27. Stephen Curry (+20) – I was ready to put him into the Top 15 until the collapse against the Spurs happened. Despite an incredible year (.318 WS/48!) and a unanimous MVP, we’re left at the end of the season wonder if he’s even the league’s best player (he’s not). He’s failed to dominate in two straight Finals now, winning the first one arguably because the 2015 Cavs were decimated by injuries and simply overmatched. He’s still headed to the Top 20 (and maybe Top 10), but the train definitely slowed down in the Finals.
26. David Robinson
25. Elgin Baylor
24. John Havlicek
23. Bob Pettit
22. Scottie Pippen
21. Isiah Thomas

Only change here is the addition of Curry.

20. Dwyane Wade – Had a chance to add onto his legacy but couldn’t get it done. His best days are past him, but a surprisingly good run could get him to the Top 15.
19. Karl Malone
18. Charles Barkley
17. Julius Erving
16. Oscar Robertson
15. Wilt Chamberlain
14. Kevin Garnett
13. Dirk Nowitzki – As impressive that he’s still the key member of some solid playoff teams, any shot at the Top 10 is probably dead.
12. Jerry West
11. Moses Malone

No changes here. Only Wade and Nowitzki can change their legacies (and perhaps Garnett?)

10. Kobe Bryant – These last three seasons did nothing for me to think he deserves to go any higher. This past season was especially embarrassing and held back the Laker future.
9. Hakeem Olajuwon
8. Shaquille O’Neal
7. Larry Bird
6. Tim Duncan (-1) – Looks like he’s run out of gas, which is a shame. While I wouldn’t rule him out of being an elite role player next year I don’t know if that’s going to be enough to get back into the Top 5.
5. Magic Johnson (-1)
4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (-1)
3. LeBron James (+3) – We’ll get to the Kareem vs. LeBron vs. Russell arguments shortly.
2. Bill Russell
1. Michael Jordan

LeBron James obviously put himself into GOAT discussion with his 2016 NBA Finals performance. I still think he has a bit to go to get to MJ (but at least it’s a discussion. That wasn’t guaranteed at all at this point), but he CAN get there. I think he clearly gets to jump Duncan and Magic here. Kareem was a tough choice, but I think LeBron’s been more impressive against better average talent than Kareem was in the 70s (not to say Kareem wasn’t impressive against good teams, it’s just that I find LeBron to be better). Lebron vs. Russell you can go back and forth with all day and I thought about it for a few days. For me it becomes a bit of a hardware argument. It’s not to say LeBron needs 11 rings, but I’d like to see #4 or #5 before I’m taking him over the best winner in NBA history.

All Hail the King: A NBA Finals Recap

Never had a NBA Finals been declared over, then not over, then over, then not over so many times.

Everyone thought Cleveland had to split the early games in Oakland to have a chance. In Game 1 Cleveland held a one point lead in the third quarter before Shaun Livingston and Leandro Barbosa surprisingly carried Golden State and pulled away to win by 15. Game 2 was an embarrassment for the Cavs. LeBron once again had nice stats but hasn’t asserted himself. Kyrie Irving was doing a crappy Allen Iverson impersonation, shooting 12 for 35 in the first two games. Kevin Love looked good in Game 1 but wasn’t much in Game 2, and then got hit in the head and would miss Game 3. Klay Thompson said that this Warriors team would beat the Showtime Lakers. It was 2-0 and Cleveland either had to win four straight or win a Game 7 in Oakland. The series was over.

And then it wasn’t. The series shifted to Cleveland where the Cavs blew out Warriors by 30 points. Richard Jefferson provided a spark both offensively and defensively starting for the injured Love. I questioned whether Love should even play in the series anymore. Irving scored 30 and hit as many shots has he did in Games 1 and 2 combined. J.R. Smith finally had a big Finals game and hit five threes. LeBron threw a monster game in there with a 32-11-6. Suddenly, if Cleveland could win Game 4 at home, we’d have a new series.

Then the series was over again. Stephen Curry, the unanimous League MVP who’d been quiet for the Finals so far, decided to remind everyone why he was MVP and dropped 38 with seven threes. LeBron and Kyrie had big games, but no one else really helped. It was 3-1 Warriors. Golden State were 88-16 at that point. They hadn’t lost three in a row in the Steve Kerr era. They lost three games all year at home. No way they were dropping three straight with two at home. The mere glimmer of hope? Draymond Green getting suspended for Game 5 for hitting James low. Justified or not (and I think considering Draymond’s past its perfectly fine), this series was still over. The question at this point was where would Draymond watch Game 5 from and would he make the celebration in time.

The only way LeBron was ever to catch Michael Jordan in the All Time Greats list was to start doing things no one else could do. He had to do something special. LeBron and Kyrie quite frankly kicked the shit out of Golden State in Oakland. LeBron started that special track with a 41-16-7-3-3 and Kyrie helped with 41 of his own. Curry was okay. Harrison Barnes flushed millions of dollars down the toilet. Thompson had a great game wasted. Once again the series wasn’t over, because if Cleveland could win Game 6 at home, well, anything could happen in a Game 7, right?

Game 6 was over by the first quarter (okay fine, Golden State did make some comebacks, but never got the lead). 31-11 Cleveland at the end of the first. LeBron decided to have another holy shit game with a 41-11-8. Curry cheated on defense all game, fouled out and threw his mouthpiece in the stands. Yeah, Game 7 was in Oakland, but looking back its obvious that Stephen Curry was rattled. The pressure was getting to Golden State. Still, both sides were right. Steve Kerr said he would take 1 game on his home floor for a title anytime. LeBron said anything can happen in the two greatest words in sports: Game 7.

Many times Golden State could have put Game 7 away. They began building a lead and had a big second quarter to take a 7 point lead into the half. But Irving brought Cleveland back. They held Cleveland to 40% shooting…but Cleveland kept attacking the rim and legitimately got to the free throw line. Draymond Green played a game so good that I would have been fine with him winning Finals MVP despite LeBron’s greatness (32-15-9 with 6 threes). With the game tied late at 89 all Golden State had to do as they did so many times during the season was hit some big shots and put Cleveland away. There are four plays I will remember from this game down the stretch. I will remember Curry, who clearly seemed rattled by the pressure, going for a behind the back pass and failing miserably. It seemed like this was Curry’s way to tell us that everything was fine and just as it always is. Of course, everything wasn’t and Golden State was falling apart. Curry throwing it away there was a microcosm of that. I will remember Curry failing to dribble past Kevin Love. Arguably the league’s best offensive player couldn’t get by the league’s worst big name defensive player when it mattered. I will remember LeBron’s “Smoke Monster” block as will everyone else. That’s a top five greatest play in NBA Finals history without a doubt. Remember, Golden State never got past 89 points…and that was their best chance at it. I will remember Kyrie Irving’s game winner with 50 seconds left on Curry. I criticized Irving for a crappy Allen Iverson impression in Games 1 and 2. He suddenly became the rich man’s Iverson, an evolutionary efficient version. It’s probably the greatest player type LeBron could ask for as a second guy. A fearless scorer who can make them when they count? It also put one last embarrassment out there for Curry: Cleveland attacked him, the league MVP, down the stretch. And it worked. LeBron also had a 27-11-11 in case that matters.

73-9 now means nothing. Curry now has to wonder about his legacy. The Warriors go into the off-season wondering if perhaps they should add Kevin Durant. But we’re all sure of one thing.

It’s still LeBron James’ league. All Hail the King.

(And congratulations Cleveland…you all deserve it).

RDT Reviews KidPoker

Spoilers because…I’m not sure how to review a documentary otherwise…

KidPoker is the inspiring story of top poker professional Daniel Negreanu. The short version of this review is that this is a great documentary that has me wanting more. Even if you aren’t a poker fan, there’s a lot to be learned from KidPoker.

KidPoker establishes early Negreanu’s super close relationship with his parents…and how Negreanu was a bit of a wild child who seemed to say whatever came out of his mouth with a lack of respect for anyone he thought was wrong. Both points really define the person Negreanu is today for better or for worse (and mostly it is for better). Negreanu telling his teacher that he’s bored in class as he decided to lay down in the back of the class isn’t that different than Negreanu telling a tournament director that his structure isn’t good or blinding himself out as a form of protest. Negreanu also is one to be proud of his accomplishments and his framing of a letter he got from school where his teacher wrote that she basically couldn’t deal with him anymore is definitely a high point.

Negreanu’s background in regards to schooling also justifies a personal belief of mine in regards to the education system. While Negreanu’s in an extreme case (I would never recommend someone dropout of school or not finish to play poker), his success proves that not everyone is going to benefit from learning about Biology or History in the classroom. If I were a parent I’d personally want my student to excel in one area than be above average in all. Give me an A+, C, C, C, C student over a B+, B+, B, B, B student any day. That A+ should be pushed. I sense Negreanu would be an A+ in math and to no surprise at all he excelled in something that required him to be good at numbers. The public education system should take note.

Anyway, back to the documentary we learn about how Negreanu began going back and forth to Vegas, going broke each time. It didn’t take him that long to figure the games out and soon his mother was in 100% support of his career (his father already was) (story about how another parent told Negreanu’s mother that she would be ashamed of him even though her son was selling drugs and stolen radios is also a highlight. You see that every day). This arrives me at point #2, when your parents are in full support of what you do it can only strengthen you. It’s obvious Negreanu drew that support from his parents throughout his career. Negreanu’s relationship with his parents, especially his mother, is the strongest point of the documentary.

Another strong point about the documentary: many of Daniel’s friends and fellow professionals being honest about the pros and cons of Negreanu himself. Jennifer Harman details how after Negreanu broke through with a surprising WSOP bracelet in 1998 he made awful financial decisions. Later in the doc Antonio Esfandiari says there’s something that to this day he still disagrees with Negreanu about but that doesn’t change how much respect he has for him. John Duthie pointed out that sometimes Negreanu said things that may have been over the line…even if he was right. Overall it was nice to see that the entire documentary wasn’t just something to soothe Negreanu’s ego.

After we see Negreanu tear up the poker scene through 2004, disappointingly we jump ahead to Negreanu’s high roller successes of 2013. I do wish there was some more focus on Negreanu’s struggles after 2004 (like his “poor” 2005 tournament results) and how he refocused and captured the Limit Hold’em title in 2008. I’m also curious how a myriad of near misses affected him, such as 2nd places in the WSOP in 2002 and 2003, and especially the 2nd place in the 2009 WSOPE Main Event. We don’t even go over his WSOP-A Main Event title in 2013 either. In fact, we don’t hear anything about his WSOP Main Event shortcomings, especially the 2001 one. Maybe these are unnecessary to the story, but I guess as a poker fan I just want to know everything (I wanted to know how his World Poker Finals run in 1997 helped him too).

Moreso about the missing period as that we don’t explore some of what seems to be significant personal relationships. We see Evelyn Ng multiple times in the documentary but we don’t get one story about her, surprising as it seems considering they are great friends and knew each other since they were about 16 (they were pool hustlers together, and pool is a part of KidPoker). We also don’t hear anything about Daniel being married in 2005, although perhaps when he’s speaking about a relationship in the Choice Center that’s what it’s in reference to (no idea). Also the biggest example of him getting doused with controversy because of his mouth is his feud with Annie Duke. Then again, why would we want her to be publicized through this documentary? So I take it back. Less Annie Duke the better.

Lastly, I’m surprised that I don’t hear the word “Pokerstars” in the entire documentary. We see the software on screen and such, but that relationship surprisingly isn’t explored.

What KidPoker does well though is it makes this larger than life poker World Champion relatable to the normal person. I too used to write sports stats and such just like Negreanu when I was a kid. Who hasn’t had success get to their head a bit and as a result made mistakes (like Negreanu lost 98 bracelet win) and assumed success would be guaranteed year after year? Who hasn’t lost an inspiring figure in their lives? Who hasn’t been criticized and as a result needed to prove themselves (I can’t help but shake my head at the 2+2 Forums references in KidPoker. While I guess it’s the best place for poker discussion most of 2+2 is an embarrassment. Hell I just read today what a fish Phil Hellmuth is in tournament poker as he took down another $1,000,000+ prize. What a joke.)

KidPoker does a great job of explaining how a wild Canadian like Negreanu became a spokesperson and ambassador for the game of poker (Phil Ivey calling it “the game of poker” and not just “poker” is awesome, but that’s another discussion). It’s well done. Sure I wish there were some more stories here…but isn’t that a sign it was a great doc in the first place?

Grade: A-

 

2016 NBA Finals Prediction

So long Toronto and Oklahoma City. In Toronto’s case they’ve proved me wrong five different times in these playoffs. Sure they lost in six, but they put up a great fight and Kyle Lowry and DeMar DeRozan definitely earned my respect. Hopefully DeRozan doesn’t leave and Toronto sticks around as a regular playoff team each year.

I don’t know if Oklahoma City fans should consider this season a win or not. They weren’t supposed to get past San Antonio and going up 3-1 on the record breaking Warriors seemed unfathomable. I’m not completely surprised that Golden State came back although I did think Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook were playing way too well for it to happen. Unfortunately, Durant will have his clutchness questioned (not unlike LeBron five years ago) and really Westbrook should too. It doesn’t mean it’s right, but eventually top stars need to get the job done. And when you’re up 3-1 that means not losing three straight. Durant is where LeBron five or six years ago and I wouldn’t count him out. We definitely got some great basketball out if it…leading to…

NBA Finals

#1 Golden State Warriors (73-9) vs. #1 Cleveland Cavaliers (57-25)

In the end we have the two #1 seeds. It may have felt like a complicated way to get here but in truth the Eastern Conference side has was always going to be the Cavs despite Toronto’s fight. Golden State, despite the 73-9 record, was always a little less certain as the Spurs loomed. Surprisingly Oklahoma City took Golden State to the limit. That plus Stephen Curry’s playoff injury plus Draymond Green suddenly becoming one of the league’s top villains has made the Warriors look vulnerable. Cleveland meanwhile has marched through the East with a 12-2 record with the highest points differential in the playoffs since the 2001 Lakers.

Let’s make the case for Cavs. First off the Cavs have LeBron James. Only the biggest haters of LeBron at this point can ignore the fact that he’s one of the best ten players of all time, one of the top two players in the league right now (and still arguably #1). Most fans have taken LeBron for granted. The fact of the matter is LeBron almost won the NBA title last year with Matthew Dellavedova as his 2nd best guy. LeBron went for 36-13-9 on AVERAGE (admittedly with a bad shooting %) and wore down the Warriors basically by himself. In fact, LeBron was my pick for Finals MVP even though Cleveland lost. And this year? This year LeBron has weapons. Like Kyrie Irving. Like Kevin Love. If good J.R. Smith shows up then include him too. If they reach their potential this is one scary team. They showed that against the Hawks in these playoffs. LeBron James can turn this series around and this time he doesn’t need to take 28 shots each game to do it.

Let’s talk about Kevin Love. Love seems to be the most inconsistent player on Cleveland. Some nights he’s nailing threes and getting double digit rebounds. Other nights he’s nowhere to be seen and a ghost on defense. His defense probably won’t magically improve, so he’ll have to have consistent big offensive nights in this series. It should be noted that in the two games against the Warriors this year Love has shot 6 for 21. He’ll have to do better than that.

Cleveland will also have to win the offensive rebounding game by a significant margin to win. This is what you were paid to do Tristan Thompson. Kevin Love also grabbed 18 boards against Golden State on Xmas…but it should be noted they still lost that game. Golden State has already beaten three of the best offensive rebounding teams in the NBA in these playoffs. It doesn’t mean Cleveland can’t win this way though.

All three of these reasons (not just one or two) will have to happen in order for Cleveland to win. Even then I’m not quite sure it will be enough.

For one Stephen Curry seems 100% over his injury and doing Stephen Curry things. He’s absolutely unstoppable in this situation and unlike last year I don’t think someone like Dellavedova is going to rattle him. And even so, Klay Thompson is clearly in peak form right now too. If there’s one thing we learned from Cleveland’s series against Toronto it’s that the perimeter defense is suspect. Lowry and DeRozan ran wild when away from Cleveland. And Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson are much better than Kyle Lowry and DeMar DeRozan. I don’t have much faith in Cleveland’s defense away from Cleveland. And in Cleveland I don’t expect for Curry to get shut down.

I also think Golden State is a strong enough team defensively to at least hold down the Cavs. Of course LeBron will get his, but will Kevin Love? I get that Kyrie Irving was just getting back into rhythm when the regular season games against the Warriors took place but he looked bad in both. Then again he was good against them in Game 1 before he went down. The Cavs may get big contributions from Channing Frye and J.R. Smith and they will need them, but I don’t know if that’s enough to win a seven game series. Defensively Draymond Green and Andre Iguodala will make Cleveland work for their points. Rebounding wise Green can also beat Cleveland as well (as he did on Christmas). Bismack Biyombo’s rebounding performance in the Eastern Conference Finals really puts a damper on the whole “Cleveland will beat Golden State by outrebounding them” strategy.

All of the intangible factors to go Golden State too. They’ve been here before. They’ve been tested and they’ve won. They’re a 73-9 juggernaut. They have the coaching advantage (although Ty Lue is quite a wildcard). They even have Anderson Varejao, who may not be a factor on the court but you can never like it when someone who’s been on one side for so long is suddenly you enemy (see Horace Grant vs. the Bulls in ‘95 or Robert Horry vs the Lakers in ’04…a Phil Jackson story there).

On Cleveland’s side Kyrie Irving’s played in one Finals game total (although in truth I think he’ll be fine). Kevin Love hasn’t yet and really hasn’t shown me he’s ready for that level of intensity. We don’t really know what difference Ty Lue made other than some stories. If anything, Cleveland had a worse regular season record after David Blatt was fired despite getting Irving back.

The Golden State Warriors are just too good to lose four out of seven. Oklahoma City was close, and I sense that was just the kick in the ass they needed too.

Warriors in 6.

My Three WSOP Trips

I’ve made three trips to Las Vegas over the last few years, each with the intent of playing in the World Series Poker. Before I delve into each trip, just a few notes about just how awesome the World Series of Poker is.

Being able to play in the World Series of Poker is a lot of fun and definitely a must for anyone who plays poker. While its expensive, there are ways to get into events without paying full price. And attendance is few anyway if you just want to be a fan. But playing in the World Series of Poker lets you play among the true greats in the game. I can’t go to a NBA game and play against LeBron James. I can’t go to a NFL game and play against Tom Brady. But I can sit at a WSOP poker table and potentially play against Phil Hellmuth or Daniel Negreanu. I can also have a ringside seat…again for free…and watch final tables (or not even) of WSOP bracelet events. It’s pretty cool standing there, watching the 10K HORSE event with about 12 tables in place, watching all the great players I’ve watched on TV over the years play.

And of course there’s always the chance, slim as it may be, of winning that WSOP bracelet for myself. Over the years a lot of people have said that winning a WSOP bracelet doesn’t have the prestige it once was. Two reasons why: there are many other big poker tournament series all over the world now and there are 60+ bracelet events a year, plus another 10 or so in Asia or Europe (quick point on the 2nd point, I kinda disagree with this as there are way more poker players overall. So there are double the bracelet events than 12 years ago. The player pool has probably increased 5 or 6 fold in some events). But I don’t care. Each year I hope I can get lucky enough to win the event I plan on playing.

So, here are short stories about my three Vegas WSOP trips.

2013

I didn’t really think about the 2013 WSOP until March of that year actually. I was in the first year of my professional job. I had a weekend off and decided to travel to Foxwoods to play the Omaha 8 WSOP Circuit event. It was only my 3rd live tournament (still sadly mourning the days of Pokerstars and Full Tilt, although I never played big stakes there anyway) and while I was still playing with basically scared money I had played my way to the Final Table. Unfortunately, the $12,000 1st place prize eluded me as I continued to play afraid and basically got blinded out with a bad call along the way. Still, a live Final Table, 8th place, $1,300 and a chance to play with a professional (Ylon Schwartz) did give me some confidence after some reflection. I decided to target the $1,500 HORSE event (I always liked the limit games, and I couldn’t go broke in one hand which would have devastated me) at the WSOP that year. I thought there was some cool coincidences along the way as Schwartz actually won the $1,500 HORSE in 2012. A bigger coincidence would come up in Vegas actually.

It should be noted that I’ve never flown before and I was quite nervous about that. Once I got through that (I still hate flying) I’ll never forget just how hot it was when I went outside. Despite that I hate the heat, the dry heat didn’t bother me that much. I rode in a cab and was amazed at the big lights for all the big casinos that I’ve only heard of before. I was amazed that I was amazed actually, since living in New York means I go to Times Square pretty much all the time. Well, now I understood how those who’ve visited Times Square for the first time felt. Even though I got there at night I decided to walk to the Rio from my hotel (the Clarion, it was a bit of a walk but I did not care. I was excited). I’ll never forget walking into the Rio Convention Center. I felt like I was home. Tables everywhere. All I heard were the sounds of chips clashing against one another. I walked around some more and saw some tournaments going on. I knew I had to get some sleep since the HORSE was the next day. But I was excited.

The $1,500 HORSE event didn’t go well for me. I was quite card dead and ultimately lost a Stud hand where I had 10h, 9h, 8h, 7h in my first five cards. I finished somewhere in the middle of the field. I was disappointed (and at first, quite bothered as that was the biggest poker tournament I had ever played up until that point) but I didn’t feel outclassed or anything. That night though I decided to sit in the stands and watch Mike Matusow win his 4th gold bracelet. Mike’s one of my favorite poker players of all time, so that was a cool experience for me. If you watch his Pokernews interview with Kristy Arnett, you can kinda see me in the background with a green basketball jersey on.

Throughout the day I was still in astonishment. I remember the first top level pro I walked by (Michael Mizrachi) and was just another fan as I saw all these guys all over the Rio. Greg Raymer, Phil Hellmuth etc.

Anyway, I was off to the Binion’s Poker Classic the next day and…to the surprise of myself for sure, decided to walk it. I don’t understand how I was able to walk three miles in 110 degree heat. I had a lot of later and don’t find dry heat that bad I guess. Anyway, 80 people put up $200 to play Omaha 8. I was pretty card dead and played way too tight (not out of fear though, I just thought that made sense and this strategy did get me to the Final Table in March). I also made a really bad mistake in misreading my hand once, and also lost a half of a big pot on a two outer. I was down to a half a bet at dinner. I got pretty lucky to get back to about 3.5 bets (A-3-8-8 over A-2-10-J), was able to double up a couple of more times and then suddenly loosened up (any fear that I may have had went away when I was down to a half a bet). I remember playing really well when we were down to 20; making good re-raises and bluffs. I was among the chipleaders as we got to the Final Table. A few things I remember. There was a player at the table who had a big stack for what seemed like forever that tried to run over everyone. I got in a good trap on him to get a lot of my chips. Later I found out that this player had a 2nd place in a WSOP PLO 8 event a few years prior. Another player was a tigher, older man who had hit the two outer on me a lot earlier. He was tough to get chips from. Also at the table was that big coincidence I wrote of earlier: Brian Scholl. Scholl has also been at the Final Table back at Foxwoods and I thought it was a crazy coincidence that we were both in this tournament. He had won the event at Foxwoods. I won a huge pot against him at the Final Table (my A-3-4-5 against his A-2-3-4 on A-6-K board). The hand is significant as I was able to get past the mistakes I made at Foxwoods (being too conservative). I had the chiplead after this and eventually went heads up with Brian, where I caught better overall and won the event. Scholl was a great sport too, taking my victory picture and congratulating me. First was also $4,300, so I was pretty pumped that my first trip through Vegas meant I was coming up with a profit. It also meant a lot to me that I won an event in the same building where legends like Doyle Brunson and Johnny Chan had won tournaments. It was also 17 hours long.

I played a little cash the next day to try that out (lost $100). I watched the Final Table of the event I came to play in the first place (another favorite of mine, Tom Schneider won). I went home counting the days till I could come back.

2014

I didn’t cash in anything else from the Omaha 8 event at Binion’s until my 2014 trip. I had played when I could and trying to get better. Unfortunately, I had an air of over-confidence. I played a few smaller events before the $1,500 HORSE this year. Two at the Golden Nugget (I think it was an Omaha 8/Stud 8 split and a HORSE) and I think another Omaha 8 at Binion’s. The only things I remember there was that the Binion’s poker room wasn’t used for poker anymore and we played downstairs, and that I ended up at the same table as someone twice. Also, Gavin Smith was playing at Binion’s which was pretty cool too. I struck out in all three events and really wasn’t focused on them. For some reason I thought it come to me. My focus did return for the $1,500 HORSE event though.

There’s a lot of things I’ll never forget about the $1,500 HORSE event on Day 1. For one, I was a table away from both Daniel Negreanu and Phil Ivey and even Phil Ivey’s stare can be intimidating from there. Jesse Sylvia, a runner-up of the WSOP Main Event, complimented my Nintendo hat and was pretty cool to talk to. I played some Stud hands with former WSOP World Champion Tom McEvoy. Two players were criticizing a Stud 8 play of mine when I got them both to put bets in when I had the high and the low (and I was confident I played it correctly, which only gave me confidence). I re-raised Jan Fisher when I had nothing to win a hand in Omaha 8. I had a pretty good run of cards overall. And I had a Top 5 chipstack (or close. Top 10 for sure) about 7 hours in. Unfortunately, I got tired as well, spewed many chips and barely made Day 2. I was excited to make Day 2, but with a small stack I didn’t get far. Cashing was top 80 and I finished approximately 144th. I was pretty disappointed overall with how I played.

2015

I had actually started watching Jason Somerville in early 2014 and I slowly was working on my NLH game. I had Final Tabled a small tournament at the Borgata in late 2014. In 2015 I decided I would play the $1,500 Stud 8 as scheduling only permit me to go to the WSOP during that week. I thought about going to play a NLH, but still wasn’t sure about how I’d feel playing a No Limit tournament with huge buy-ins. Fortunately, or unfortunately, I played two small events at the Borgata a couple weeks prior. I played really well in both. I just got knocked out of the money in the first event as a four to one favorite of being close to the chiplead, and I cashed the 2nd and got KOed on my AK vs. J9. But overall I thought I played great in both events. It gave me to confidence to try playing a couple of 1K No Limits at the WSOP. I played a $1,000 NLH, the $1,111 Little One For One Drop and the $1,500 Stud 8. I played some smaller events as well.

I do regret playing the $1Ks though. I clearly wasn’t ready for them and busting out early in the first 1K…which was my first day in Vegas, put me in a mindset that wasn’t good. I didn’t play anything well until the very last event. I blew a good position in a small Omaha Hi tournament at Planet Hollywood. I busted out early in the Little One. I played poorly in the HORSE at Binions. I felt defeated right after Day 1 for some reason. I remember playing the Stud 8 and playing terribly the whole time.

I finally did get into gear in the last event on my schedule: a $400, 200K GTD at Planet Hollywood. I was able to cash in the event, although I recognize mistakes I made along the way. Still, I felt like I could play better and there were definitely paths to winning these events.

I don’t know what’s going to happen in the 2016 WSOP but I am confident. Since the 2015 WSOP I’ve made two Final Tables in small events. I’m happier in my personal life than I’ve been in a while and I think that’s going to lead me into playing great. I finally get to play the $1,500 WSOP Omaha 8 event as well. Maybe this will be my year?

 

RDT Reviews Captain America: The First Avenger

Big spoilers here…I mean the film has been out for five years now

Captain America: The First Avenger has one goal and it accomplishes it: provide an origin story for Captain America (I suppose it sets up some things for The Avengers as well). It accomplishes this goal in a straightforward manner in a very good but not quite great way.

The First Avenger is a classic zero to hero story. Steve Rogers is a skinny kid in Brooklyn with a great heart and fighting spirit. He’s found by a scientist for the U.S. military who’s directing a project to create the ultimate super solider and thinks Rogers the right choice because of his personality. It turns out he’s right, as Rogers is transformed into Captain America, proves his worth, and takes down the Nazi organization HYDRA, led by the Red Skull. It’s a basic but good story that gets the point across.

The First Avenger is made up of several mini-arcs that work, yet are rushed. He starts off as that skinny kid that no one believes in (and may be smarter than everyone else too), but rather early in the film he’s transformed into Captain America. He’s stuck as a symbol of the American effort in World War II, another interesting direction, but then decides to go on his own and free soldiers (including his friend “Bucky” Barnes). Agent Carter falls for him, sees him kissing someone else, gets mad then falls for him again. It works…but again it’s rushed. Admittedly his friendship with Bucky is underdeveloped…but still good enough.

Some of the performances work really well here. Tommy Lee Jones is great as Colonel Chester Phillips and Hayley Atwell is just as great as Agent Carter. Hugo Weaving is a very good villain as well as his Red Skull is one of the more memorable Marvel villains in the MCU (whatever that’s saying). Chris Evans wasn’t bad either.

Perhaps I didn’t say much in this review but in turn there’s not a lot to say. There’s much more good than bad and we get a good origin story for Captain America. There’s nothing in this film I would particularly classify as bad other than it being a bit rushed.

We also had one of the better final scenes of the MCU…when Cap wakes up in modern day NY, setting up the Avengers. Just a great scene.

Pros:

+Agent Carter is great, and the Red Skull is one of the more memorable MCU villains.

+Zero to Hero story done quite well.

+Establishes the Captain America character well.

+It was cool to see Howard Stark in action.

Cons:

-Some plot points are a bit rushed.

A good film that establishes Captain America for the MCU. There’s not much bad here at all and a whole lot of good.

Grade: B+

 

RDT Reviews Thor

Big spoilers here…I mean the film has been out for five years now

I wasn’t sure what to expect when I first began watching Thor. Thor is a bit of an outsider when it comes to the Marvel Cinematic Universe as he, unlike the others (up until this point) isn’t an Earth-based being. He’s a god set to become King of Asgard, his home planet. And that’s how our story starts. Thor is just about to be bestowed the kingship before Asgard is attacked by the Frost Giants of of Jotunheim, a enemy of Asgard that had lost a war to Thor’s father years ago.

Sounds like a far cry from Iron Man or even the Hulk right? Well, it still works. Thor shows that he isn’t worthy to the crown (I actually don’t understand why his father, Odin, thought he was worthy of it in the first place) by attacking Jotunheim and disobeying his father in doing so. So Odin banished him to Earth and throws the Mjolnir (Thor’s Hammer) there too. It’s up to Thor to learn humility and become worthy to wield the Mjolnir. During all this, Thor’s brother Loki has been plotting behind the scenes to obtain the crown of Asgard himself and looks to keep Thor on Earth forever.

The opening 30 minutes, with Thor disobeying his father and battling the Frost Giants does feel out of place with the rest of the MCU so far, but it’s still entertaining enough. The film really picks up though when Thor is sent to Earth. He meets Dr. Erik Selvig, Darcy Lewis and Dr. Jane Foster and they both want to know what they just discovered.  While Lewis and Selvig dismiss him as a crazy man, Foster doesn’t give up on him and tries to learn more about him. S.H.I.E.L.D. is also out to find out more about Thor as they’ve found the Mjolnir. Everything from Thor landing on Earth to him finally reaching the Mjolnir but not being able to lift it is really good.

Unfortunately after that the film suffers a bit as it tries to tie up too many stories. After Thor fails to lift the hammer, his transition from crazy man pretending to be a god to normal good man is a bit off, and his love relationship with Jane is rushed. I wouldn’t say any of it is bad, it just isn’t as good as the hour proceeding it. There’s also the matter of Loki telling Thor that his father’s dead (a lie) and that he wants Thor banished forever (also a lie). Loki says he’s king now but can’t unbanish Thor, which really should have rang alarm bells in Thor’s head. We also learn that Loki is a child of the Frost Giants, which is a bit unnecessary as a story element but works just fine.

The film does hit another high point after that, as Thor proves he’s worthy and regains use of the Mjolnir. While the final battles are disappointing, everything works well enough that I can still say I enjoyed the film and wasn’t let down.

Most of the performances were good as I liked Natalie Portman, Chris Hemsworth and Anthony Hopkins. Refreshingly, Tom Hiddleston gives us a memorable MCU villain, and his presence in the end credits scene assures we see more of him in the future.

It’s worth noting that Asgard looks great as well.

Pros:

+Good performances from the main characters.

+Thor as a crazy man works really well.

+Story is solid.

+Loki is our first memorable MCU villain.

+S.H.I.E.L.D. tie-in works a lot better than in Iron Man 2.

Cons:

-Film drags a bit after Thor learns he isn’t worthy.

-Jane Foster-Thor relationship rather lacking.

A good film here. While nothing mind blowingly special, it works well enough to establish Thor and Loki in the MCU.

Grade: B